Helmets: English vs Western [Archive] - Trot.org Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Helmets: English vs Western


Jackandmo
03-11-2008, 10:03 AM
I know that the helmet topic has been discussed at length, but I have a new twist. I will be writing an argument research paper about helmets and the "requirements" that pertain to western and english.

To give you a brief background on why I chose this topic -

This weekend, I entered an equitation class on my QH at a local facility. I was riding in a cutback and no double bridle. I wore jeans, had my hair in a clip, ear warmers and sunglasses on my head, and a sweatshirt.

There was one other entry decked to the max in her H/J attire.

I received the blue in this class.

After the class, I was approached by a less than pleasant H/J person who said that helmets were required in classes, and I was at a H/J show, NOT a saddleseat show.

Whatever...I won't spend another dime at their facility (the show is BIG time for them, fun/schooling for me!)

So, I had a conversation with the facility owner who said from now on, helmets will be required at all H/J shows in ALL classes. This is due to safety, insurance, and influence. He also said that helmets were required as part of the "attire" but said nothing of my flat saddle and my jeans. Go figure.

However, helmets are NOT required at their western gaming shows and exteme trail challenges.

The class I was in we trotted half way around the arena both ways. Gaming shows and trail challenges involve small cliffs, galloping, etc. but NOONE, even those under the age of 18, are required to wear a helmet. If you're under 18, you can sign a waiver.

So, I hope that I am not the only one who sees the hypocricy in this.

Any thoughts or opinions on why it's more important in one discipline and not the other?

BTW, both ASB3G and I have shown at this show in the past without a helmet and nothing was said. At that show, one of us was excused and the other didn't place. It wasn't an issue until this most recent show. Interesting, isn't it?

kaitsmom
03-11-2008, 12:11 PM
BTW, both ASB3G and I have shown at this show in the past without a helmet and nothing was said. At that show, one of us was excused and the other didn't place. It wasn't an issue until this most recent show. Interesting, isn't it?

Perhaps the person you beat was "important" and complained enough?

wstrngrl
03-11-2008, 12:52 PM
I think some places are getting more into the 'insurance/liability' part of it more than anything. And it may very well be that the insurance providers feel that the H/J activities are more "high risk" than others; and in order to keep insurance rates down the facilities have to require helmets in those events...

Our local 'B' show is starting to require helmets in all 10 & under and leadline classes (which are primarily saddle seat). This is the first year for that; it was never an issue before (that I know of).

SaddlebredMom
03-11-2008, 03:52 PM
What class you were in? Does the show require "proper attire"? Helmets are considered part of the "proper attire" for h/j, and cowboy hats for western, and derbys for SS, etc., so the "importance" in that instance would be based upon your attire meeting the requirements of the discipline you are riding in.

I don't think, from a safety standpoint, the importance is any different from one discipline to another, except for jumpers or eventers where there is an increased risk/possibility of coming off. In fact, due to safety/liability issues, a lot of the open shows around me are requiring helmets period, and the discipline (western or any english seat) doesn't matter.